IL.View beta builds are now available online


Today I’m glad to announce that thanks to Github “project pages” feature I am able to host beta builds of “IL.View” that can be consumed both in browswer and out of browser.

You can browse and/or install IL.View by navigating this link: http://denisvuyka.github.com/IL.View

 

What’s new in the deployed build:

I have added an experimental support for Silverlight “.xap” packages. It will be possible to drop a “.xap” file onto IL.View surface and navigate it’s content within assembly browser like shown below:

Just have to note that the implementation of “.xap” browsing is in its early stage and is not feature complete.

What’s on the way:

Many features related to MEF framework. I’m a greatest fan of MEF and use it every day in the production. There’s some tooling that I would like to integrate into IL.View like displaying all the MEF imports/exports for the particular assembly, etc. More content viewers are pending (xaml/xml, images, etc.)

Suggestions, issues and feedbacks?

I would really appreciate to get them registered here: IL.View Issues

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “IL.View beta builds are now available online

  1. Very good job!

    One thing that you might think of is UI. Reflector was good for when it’s started, but by now it is an ugly hideousness. Pulling a bright skin onto it makes it a bit sweeter, but it’s still nowhere close to the usabilty that users have come to expect lately. You have to click and click and expand and exercise your wrist as if you’re using Explorer in Win95 era 🙂

    Another is even more tough to pull off. Mono.Cecil is slightly shabby with duplication and unnecessary direct/delayed modes — but ICSharpCode manages to be even fatter. It’s nothing to do with your code, but I wish there was a decompiler that just did its decompiling job rather that try to be a refactoring tool and a pattern matching engine and a kitchen sink. I know it’s not visible to the user of IL.View, but I bet it slows down the process.

    • Thanks for the feedbacks. I cannot agree more with your concerns. To be honest I have absolutely no intention to create “another Reflector clone”. I’m more interested in the code analysis and rich code/dependency visualization, including many UI features I’ve been missing for a long time with Reflector. However to start doing cool things I have to ensure the basic (and expected) functionality is working as expected. New blog posts unveling new features are on the way 🙂
      Regards,
      Denis

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s